CASE OF: Vineetkumar Raghavjibhai Bhalodia vs. ITO (ITAT Rajkot)
The assessee received a gift of Rs.60 lakhs from his HUF. The AO & CIT(A) held that as HUF was not covered by the definition of “relative”, the gift was chargeable to tax u/s 56(2)(v). The alternate submission that gift was exempt u/s 10(2)was rejected on the basis that s. 10(2) applied only to amounts received “out of income of the estate” on partial or total partition of the HUF. On appeal by the assessee, HELD allowing the appeal:
(i) S. 56(2)(v) exempts gifts from a “relative”. Though the definition of the term “relative” does not specifically include a Hindu Undivided Family, a ‘HUF” constitutes all persons lineally descended from a common ancestor and includes their mothers, wives or widows and unmarried daughters. As all these persons fall in the definition of “relative”, an HUF is ‘a group of relatives’. As a gift from a “relative” is exempt, a gift from a ‘group of relatives’ is also exempt since the singular will include the plural;
(ii) The gift was also exempt u/s 10(2) because the two conditions required to be satisfied for relief viz (1) that the assessee is a member of the HUF and (2) that he receives the sum out of the income of such HUF (may be of an earlier Year) were satisfied.
1.Visit us at www.taxpertindia.blogspot.com 2.FOLLOW US ON TWITTER CLICK HERE: http://twitter.com/taxpertindia 3.Posted www.taxpertindia.blogspot.com 4.Get Tax updates from my blog through by joining my google group CA_taxmannindia:http://groups.google.co.in/group/ca_taxmannindia?hl=en 5.Get Free Quality SMS updates from my blog on your MOBILE:http://labs.google.co.in/smschannels/subscribe/ca_taxmannindia OR Send a message JOIN CA_TaxmannIndia to 9870807070 thru ur mobile nd receive updates
